Big shops
like Primark sell their goods very cheap. In other places the price would be more
expensive. Clothes and goods from Primark weren't all made by machines; but in
dirty, narrow streets and houses in India. Against the rule, woman and children
work secretly over hours on the hardest and the most difficult clothes. Nevertheless,
these people get paid less for their hard work.
Because of the cheap price, people like us, usually forget the effort that is put into the products when we buy something. This documentary (from BBC) critics about how poor people get cheated. They need to do all the work and only getting less money. The rest of the profit the bosses owns. We need to be aware by buying cheap goods, that it could be those things which were paid inequitable.
Before I
watched this documentary, I only knew little about this topic. I noticed that
cheap prices can't be true, due to the process of making it. But I thought that
machines were making the goods and not people. We learned already about Fair
Trade and this is a similar topic. People always cheat to get profit for
themselves.
Before I
didn't really care much about how things are produced. I used to buy lots of
cheap stuff to save money. It didn't came in my mind that people were working
hard on it. But now that I know how things are produced, who made it and how hard
people are putting effort into it; I feel really guilty. I'm shocked and horrified
by the truth that was hidden. I feel sorry for them. But why do people not do
anything to stop the children from working? Can't anyone help these people to
get their fair amount of money? How do we know which products were fair paid?
I think to
stop the children from working is to persuade their families. It is a hard
thing because this rule is always broken. But for helping people to get the
fair amount of money, people could use globalization to spread the help and
protest against this problem. If we want to know if the products are fair we
could search for more evidence like in the video or the world would decide on
one logo to know it's a fair product.
3.5/4 - a very good summary. At times it is more of a "call to action" piece rather than thinking about the sort of questions we need to ask and the sort of data/research that would need to be taken. If I have read the article correctly, you believe that global action would be the best at solving this issue - how could this be coordinated?
AntwortenLöschen